Among other things, Greydanus observes the prominence of hellish figures over heavenly powers.
Whatever the balance of power between good and evil in these films, there's an obvious sense in which nearly every film in the genre portrays a world in which the powers of hell seems to play a far more active and visible role in the world than the powers of heaven. Demons and other unholy things may or may not be checked or destroyed with crucifixes and the like, but seldom if ever is there any hint that angels also are active in human affairs.
How come? He surmizes this is due to the tremendous difficulty we have at creative portrayals of heaven.
Your thoughts?Why is there so much hell and so little heaven in these movies? Partly, perhaps, it's because filmmakers simply don't know what to do with God—not just theologically, but for the sheer dramatic difficulty posed by omnipotence. It's the Superman dilemma times infinity: Against that much power, how do you make the enemy a credible threat? Even Gandalf's power was ultimately too intimidating for Peter Jackson and company; once it became clear the wizard could drive off the flying Nazgul, the filmmakers feared the enemy might seem too diminished. (This was the rationale for the problematic scene in which the Witch-King shatters Gandalf's staff.)
Another reason for the neglect of heaven is simply that heaven is harder to do. C. S. Lewis noted this point in his preface to The Screwtape Letters, in which he regretted being unable to offset Screwtape's diabolical perspective with a parallel heavenly correspondence presenting "arch-angelical advice to the patient's guardian angel." While the task of twisting his mind into a hellish perspective was for Lewis oppressive but not difficult, assuming an angelic voice seemed to him all but unachievable.
While Lewis did later achieve some success in dramatically depicting the outskirts of heaven in The Great Divorce, the general disparity of depicting heaven and hell in art and drama has been felt by many. It's not hard to see why. Beauty is more elusive an effect than grotesquerie; misery and wretchedness are far easier to inflict, and therefore to imagine and express, than joy and beatitude are to bestow or evoke.
1 comment:
Interesting article. It seems to me that dark images are easier to come by in a dark, fallen world. Heavenly images and figures are far more out of our reach. We have experience with many dark, twisted and horrifying things through real-life. We can easily conjure up scary mental pictures, but heavenly ones are much more elusive.
I think it is even harder to give expression to heavenly images in movies as opposed to books. For example, C.S. Lewis' heavenly descriptions in the Chronicles of Narnia series are much more moving on paper than on the big screen (at least for me personally). Maybe because our imagination can create a fuller picture than a staged scene...I don't know.
Just my thoughts...
Post a Comment